greenwashing

Why we keep looking back: lasting ideas in a time of endless content

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Editorial reflection — ideas worth revisiting when everyone is chasing what’s new


A year moves fast, but lasting ideas don’t. We live amid new headlines, new trends, new urgency — but not everything worth saying belongs only to the moment it’s written.

Actually, we’re flooded by new content. Yet content is a funny word. It’s mostly related to people oversharing what they buy, eat, travel, and so on—call it content. In fact, content often means: show your overconsumption habits to the world.

As we move further into 2025, we’re pausing to look back at stories that haven’t aged. Not because they were “timely,” but because they were timeless.
In a society — and a digital world — obsessed with the next thing, we’ve always valued depth over speed, understanding over reaction, and clarity over noise.

What follows is a curated return to ideas that still speak, question, and clarify. Not a retrospective, but a reaffirmation: some thoughts don’t expire.

Lasting ideas worth revisiting


Below is a curated selection of posts that continue to resonate. Each one offers insight into the mechanisms, contradictions, and possibilities in fashion and beyond.

• Breaking free from the social media trap
We explored the possibility of escaping algorithmic feeds and finding better ways to connect.

Breaking free from the social media trap: Instagram Algorithms and TikTok’s future

• Preserving the Brain at Fondazione Prada
Two posts examining how brands exist within culture, through the lens of art, neuroscience, and cognitive reserve.

The lexicon of neurodegenerative diseases

Dialogue with art – aesthetic experience, cognitive reserve, and social interaction

• Holding brands accountable
A critical look at greenwashing and the role of the sustainability critic.

Being a sustainability critic: what does it really mean?

• Microplastics on human health
A three-part series from a dedicated event.

1: Understanding the problem

2: Health risks and scientific findings

3: Impact in fashion

• Indiscriminate discounts
A deeper exploration of how perpetual sales have compromised the market’s value.

Indiscriminate discounts — A practice that has spiralled out of control

• The myth of cheap luxury
Exploring why “cheap luxury” doesn’t exist and the social media scams that promote it.

The myth of cheap luxury and why it doesn’t exist

• Stories behind the collections
An analysis of the tension between idealism and reality in contemporary fashion narratives. Exploring the idea of one piece, one story.

The stories behind SS25: Tension between idealism and reality

• The reality of manufacturing: luxury sweatshops
Investigating the supply chain and the conscious disconnect of consumers.

Luxury sweatshops: the ugly truth behind the fashion industry — and why consumers look away

Final thoughts


Looking back isn’t about nostalgia — it’s about continuity. It is how we identify lasting ideas—the narratives that carry their weight beyond the moment.

In the rush to produce, publish, and promote, we can forget that the most valuable ideas are often those that last: the ones that explain, question, and clarify again and again.
This selection is a reminder that depth has its own timeline. Some stories keep working long after they’re written.

We invite you to wander further into our archive — there’s always more to uncover — and join our newsletter (signup is in the sidebar on desktop, at the bottom of the page on mobile, or here) for reflections that move at a different pace.

A note to our readers: since February 2025, all our posts are available in both English and Italian. To switch language, click the flag icon in the site menu on desktop, or tap the menu icon (three lines on the right) on mobile to access the language selector.

Why we keep looking back: lasting ideas in a time of endless content Read More »

Editorial reflection on what still matters: against the rush of new content

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Looking back, reading forward: why some stories are still worth our attention


Since we’re approaching the end of the year, today’s post is an editorial reflection on what we’ve written so far and why it still feels relevant.

In an era dominated by mass content creation—often fast, repetitive, and empty—we have tried to remain attentive to what happens around us, making sense of events, news, and shifts rather than simply reacting to them. Over time, our work has focused on observation, context, and responsibility, choosing depth over immediacy.

Alongside this, we have consistently worked to clarify what greenwashing is, how to recognise it, and how it differs from genuine sustainability. This effort took a more structured form in our eBook, This Is Greenwashing. In reality, our critical approach to sustainability has always been part of our wider editorial lens, shaping how we read fashion, culture, and systems of production.

Because of this, many of our previous posts remain relevant. They were not written for the moment, but for understanding. Today, we circle back to some of them—pieces that still speak clearly, ask necessary questions, and deserve to be read again.

Editorial reflection: looking back, reading forward


Below is a curated selection of posts that continue to resonate. Each one offers insight into the mechanisms, contradictions, and possibilities of the contemporary fashion landscape.

• We are proud to give voice to designer Consti Gao, co-founder of JAMPROOF. This post is crucial to understanding what it means to build a brand in the contemporary landscape.

Sisyphus’ seventh season — emerging fashion brands in today’s landscape

• This post explores the logic behind labour exploitation and why it signals something deeper—a pattern that connects the fashion industry to any other field.

13 more brands under investigation in Milan for labour exploitation

• A story of slow fashion from Japan, where mud-dyeing becomes a language of time, care, and human connection to the earth.

Clay dye processing: the colour of the earth

• Greenwashing is what, most of the time, hides behind the language of sustainability. This piece helps build the tools to see more clearly.

Greenwashing: The system is designed to fail. It’s time to see clearly

 Is secondhand truly an effective solution, or is it being absorbed by the same logic of overconsumption it was meant to counter?

Secondhand fashion and overconsumption: Is thrifting the new fast fashion?

 Here, we analyse why—despite extremely expensive fashion schools—what the industry increasingly rewards is not skill, but visibility and hype.

Fashion is no longer a job for fashion designers

We invite you to read—or reread—these pieces slowly, without urgency, allowing space for reflection rather than consumption. And perhaps even discover other posts you might have missed.

Final thoughts


This editorial reflection is not about looking back with nostalgia, but about recognising continuity. It’s about understanding what endures and what can guide us forward. Some questions don’t expire, and some texts don’t either. In a digital space driven by constant output, choosing to reread is also a form of responsibility.

Take your time to explore our archive — there’s more to discover — and subscribe to our newsletter to receive reflections, stories, and insights throughout the year.

Editorial reflection on what still matters: against the rush of new content Read More »

Pambianco Fashion Summit: thirty years of fashion, from designers to large groups. What future for Made in Italy?

Reading Time: 4 minutes

When sustainability becomes a buzzword and growth remains the real goal


We have just followed the 30th Pambianco Fashion Summit. Once again, sustainability was the magic word everyone loved to repeat. But immediately afterwards came the true priority: growth. Always growth.

In this panel, ultra-fast fashion from China plays the villain, while Northern European fast fashion receives applause. After all, H&M is on stage to explain circularity.

And so the question returns, louder after every panel:
What haven’t these CEOs, presidents, managers, founders and the rest understood about the meaning of sustainability?
Because the more they say it, the more the word sounds like a joke.

Consumers want authenticity—so why is fashion still pretending?


Erika Andreetta (PwC Italy) highlights what already seems obvious:

  • People want reliable, transparent, consistent brands. In short, authenticity.
  • They seek alignment with cultural values.
  • Second-hand is growing three times faster than traditional fashion.
  • Outlet shopping is growing five times faster.
  • Value matters: products aligned with personal values, at the right price.
  • Brands still produce too much—and don’t sell their overproduction.
  • Multi-brand stores have become the places where people actually look for something new.

As for European fashion, the disillusionment is generational:

  • Young people don’t see originality.
  • Baby boomers have other priorities.
  • Gen Xers find prices unjustifiable.

Fashion listens, but selectively.

Pambianco Fashion Summit: Sburlati, “a system under attack”


According to Sburlati (Confindustria Moda), the fashion ecosystem is under pressure on three fronts:

  1. From the East: exports down 3%, imports up 5%, fueled by China (+18%).
    Postal packages under €150 pay no customs duties or VAT—an obvious distortion.
  2. From the West: a weak dollar, double tariffs in the US, and a push for local brands.
  3. From within: a fragile Italian market.

Sburlati came to a dramatic conclusion:

“We are on the brink of collapse and risk ending up like the automotive industry.”

Capasa (CNMI): the luxury narrative is shifting


A negative narrative surrounds luxury — one that started in China.
Proposed solutions include:

  • An anti–fast fashion law with tariffs across the board.
  • A French-style approach: taxes on packages and a ban on misleading advertising.
  • Support for new businesses at a time when more are closing than opening.

Capasa adds a point on young consumers: “Young people are all environmentalists. We must explain to them that fast fashion is not. We need to explain the value of quality and creativity.”

And then… H&M entered the room


This is where the contradictions become glaring.

The industry complains — rightly — about Chinese ultra-fast fashion. However, it then invites H&M, a symbol of Western fast fashion, to discuss circularity and therefore “sustainability.”

So yes, we ask again:
What exactly have these leaders failed to understand about sustainability?
Can a brand built on overproduction ever be sustainable?
Because every time fast fashion is framed as “sustainable,” we’re entering the realm of greenwashing.

E-commerce


Another point raised: a shift in digital strategy is necessary.

  • Over 60% of brands are not ready.
  • Yet today, 80% of sales involve a digital touchpoint.

Clothing & sustainability

  • The idea of more durable, timeless garments is gaining traction — pieces suitable for multiple seasons and less overconsumption.
  • 54% of products are sold on sale. The second month of sales is the strongest — meaning consumers wait for the sales of the sales.
  • Millennials (28–44 years old) spend more — around 36 items per year.
  • Clothing is losing value; personal care and beauty are more engaging.
  • Women continue to consume a lot, but above all, they remain tied to fast fashion.
  • Gen Z is starting to think about quality, longer-lasting pieces, and niche products.
  • Young people are the demographic most sensitive to sustainability — but garments should not cost more than their traditional counterparts.
  • Gen Z wants clarity: What is a sustainable garment?
    A simple question the industry will probably never answer. But we do — you’ll find the answer in This Is Greenwashing here.

Final thoughts


In conclusion, the 30th Pambianco Fashion Summit analysed fashion, from designers to large groups, and attempted to explore what the future holds for Made in Italy.

If sustainability continues to coexist with an obsession for infinite growth, with overproduction, with contradictory narratives, the word will lose all meaning.

Until the industry stops applauding whoever says “circularity” the loudest and starts reducing — truly reducing — its impact, these summits will remain conversations about sustainability without actual sustainability.

Pambianco Fashion Summit: thirty years of fashion, from designers to large groups. What future for Made in Italy? Read More »

Greenwashing: The system is designed to fail. It’s time to see clearly

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Our guide to spotting greenwashing — born from witnessing the system’s hijacking — now available in Italian


How can people tell what is truly sustainable — or confidently say: this is greenwashing?

Let’s take one example we’ve just shared: African organisations are accusing a major UN circularity project of unreliable data and a tainted process.
This isn’t just a failure; it’s a hijacking.

But how can we distinguish between genuine initiatives and those that are not?
The core conflict is no longer just about data — it’s about who gets to define circularity and sustainability.

Side-by-side comparison of  'This is Greenwashing' English book cover and 'Questo è Greenwashing' Italian edition book cover, showing the two versions of the guide to spotting false environmental claims.
Questo è greenwashing – This is Greenwashing

Greenwashing: A system designed to fail


When fast-fashion entities help set the rules for a UN process meant to regulate them, the outcome is predictable: a system designed to fail.
In other words, a system that protects overproduction and waste under the guise of sustainability.

This is greenwashing at the highest level — the green fog at its thickest — designed to confuse us into compliance while the real work of change is undermined.

And this is precisely why we wrote This is Greenwashing.

This eBook goes beyond spotting a fake “eco-friendly” label.
It’s a guide to understanding the systemic lies that corrupts projects like the UNEP’s. It equips you with tools to see through the green fog created by the very systems meant to protect us.

We wrote it because when regulation fails — or is hijacked — awareness becomes our strongest line of defence.

In a world where the credibility of global environmental governance hangs in the balance, we must equip ourselves with the power to see clearly, demand better, and stop being manipulated.

This is Greenwashing – Now available in Italian


🌍 Now available in Italian: Your guide to seeing through the green fog
We are proud to launch This Is Greenwashing in Italian.

This guide will help you:
✔ Decode the jargon and spot lies at a glance
✔ Understand the tactics used not just by brands, but by entire systems to appear “green”
✔ Arm yourself with practical knowledge to make informed choices

In a system designed to fail, knowledge isn’t just power — it’s resistance.

📘 🇮🇹 Get your Italian eBook here: books2read.com/u/mYJ8lP
📘 🇬🇧 Get your English eBook here: https://books2read.com/u/bpgxOX

📣 Please help spread the word by leaving a review — it makes all the difference.

“This is greenwashing’s greatest crime: distracting us with false solutions as the planet burns.”

Spot the lies. Demand better.

P.S. Share this with anyone who questions the ‘sustainable’ façade. It’s time we clear the green fog, together.

 🌿 Now available as an eBook — the print version will follow.

Greenwashing: The system is designed to fail. It’s time to see clearly Read More »

African organisations accuse UNEP’s Textile Circularity Project of unreliable data and a tainted process

Reading Time: 3 minutes

African coaltion warns that proposed global guidelines, built on flawed foundations, threaten millions of livelihoods and the future of textile reuse


A coalition of African organisations, supported by experts from Europe, Asia, and America, has sent a formal letter to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). The letter raises concerns about the reliability of the data underpinning UNEP’s projects for global textile circularity and protests against the credibility granted to entities described as “beholden” to fast fashion giants.

The open letter directly challenges UNEP’s Circularity and Trade of Used Textiles project. This project aims to create global guidelines distinguishing reusable second-hand clothing from waste. The signatories, representing the livelihoods of millions in the sorting, repair, and resale trades, argue that the entire effort is compromised from its foundation. (Fashion Magazine).

African organisations: the letter of accusation


Their core accusations are threefold:

  1. Unreliable data:
    The project relies on unverified figures, such as the frequently cited claim that 95% of textile waste is reusable. A figure that contradicts established industry knowledge and lacks transparent collection methods.
  2. A tainted process: 
    The coalition describes the consultations as rushed and exclusionary, sidelining the very experts who understand the complex realities of the trade.
  3. Corporate influence: 
    In Ghana, an NGO funded by the ultra-fast fashion industry led the research. The very entities whose overproduction is the root of the waste crisis — creating an unacceptable conflict of interest.

“What we have observed does not match the objectivity expected from a UN programme,” said Jeffren Boakye Abrokwah, President of the Ghanaian Used Clothing Dealers Association. “In Ghana, UNEP’s research partner is an NGO that already runs a waste campaign. It is funded by the fast fashion industry. This compromises the neutrality of the data.”

However, this sentiment found an international echo. Alan Wheeler, Director General of the UK’s Textile Recycling Association, stated, “UNEP’s willingness to adopt unverified conclusions contradicts its stated commitment to impartiality and undermines public trust.”

But this dispute erupts as the second-hand clothing market faces unprecedented strain. New, low-quality garments flood African markets. While in Europe, collectors are on strike and countries like Sweden are authorising the destruction of unsold clothing. Against this backdrop, the call for credible and impartial solutions has never been more urgent.

Final thoughts


In conclusion, the core conflict is no longer just about data or methodology. It is about who gets to define circularity. The African organisations’ letter exposes a disturbing reality. In essence, the industry itself may shape a UN process meant to regulate the fashion industry’s waste.

So this is not merely a failure of process; it is a hijacking of the solution. Letting fast-fashion entities set the rules, the UNEP project legitimises greenwashing and undermines the circular economy it aims to protect. In other words, the system is not simply being poorly designed. It is being designed to fail, preserving a linear model of overproduction and waste under the guise of sustainability.

The credibility of global environmental governance now hangs in the balance.

African organisations accuse UNEP’s Textile Circularity Project of unreliable data and a tainted process Read More »