Milano Cortina Olympics: snow needs cold, not crude
The uncomfortable truth behind “sustainable” and “neutral” Winter Olympics
There is a lot of excitement in the air for Milano Cortina Olympics. In fact, the Games are set to showcase sport, landscape, and international cooperation. We are told to celebrate fashion, food, culture, and people.
In reality, it risks becoming yet another glossy exercise in greenwashing. And not only that. The Games also reveal a deeper, more disturbing contradiction: selective ethics, selective exclusions, selective silence.
Winter sports need snow, not fossil fuels
Winter sports depend on snow, ice, and stable temperatures. Yet the Milano Cortina Winter Olympics are sponsored by Eni, one of Italy’s largest oil and gas companies—an industry that directly fuels the climate crisis threatening the very existence of winter itself.
This contradiction is not accidental. It is strategic.
As Greenpeace Italia recently stated:
“Winter sports need snow, not polluting companies.”
Milano Cortina Olympics: when sponsorship becomes image laundering
Sponsorships like these are not neutral acts of support. They are tools of reputation laundering, designed to associate fossil fuel corporations with values such as resilience, excellence, and sustainability, while diverting attention from the environmental damage caused by their core business.
Eni’s presence at the Olympics does not reduce emissions.
It does not protect glaciers.
It does not safeguard mountain ecosystems.
What it does is offer a powerful stage to rewrite a narrative.
The climate crisis is not an abstract backdrop
The climate emergency is already reshaping winter sports:
- artificial snow replacing natural snowfall
- shortened seasons and shrinking glaciers
- increasing environmental pressure on fragile alpine territories
Allowing companies that actively contribute to global warming to sponsor the Winter Olympics means ignoring this reality—or worse, normalising it.
As Greenpeace puts it:
“Those who fuel the climate crisis, threatening the survival of ice and snow on which the Winter Games depend, cannot be sponsors of the Games.”
This is not radicalism. It is coherence.
The IOC’s responsibility
The International Olympic Committee often speaks the language of sustainability. But language without action remains branding.
If the Olympic movement genuinely wants to protect the future of winter sports, it must take a clear stance and end sponsorships from oil and gas companies—just as tobacco sponsorships were once banned from sport for ethical reasons.
Some industries are simply incompatible with certain values.
Fossil fuels and the Winter Olympics are one of those cases.
A double standard dressed as neutrality
Russia is out. Israel is in.
The official justification for excluding Russia from the Olympic Games was the violation of international law and the incompatibility of war with Olympic values. Yet the same principles seem to dissolve when it comes to Israel, despite the scale of destruction and civilian deaths in Palestine far exceeding many past conflicts that have led to sanctions.
This selective morality undermines any claim of neutrality. When sport chooses silence in the face of certain atrocities and outrage in others, it stops being a space of peace and becomes a mirror of geopolitical hypocrisy.
The discomfort was impossible to fully contain. During the opening ceremony, J.D. Vance was met with loud boos from the audience—an unplanned rupture in the performance of neutrality. Even as cameras attempted to manage the narrative, the reaction exposed a growing gap between institutional silence and public conscience.
Israel’s parade was embarrassing.
Just as embarrassing was the attempt to erase Ghali through selective camera framing—an evident effort to censor his words and silence his pro-Palestinian stance.
Is it really still unclear that Israel is committing genocide, as widely documented by human rights observers?
Ghali, Rodari, and the words that should never be censored
Ghali recited Reminder, a poem by Gianni Rodari:
“There are things to do every day:
wash, study, play,
and set the table at midday.
There are things to do at night:
close your eyes, sleep,
have dreams for dreaming,
ears for hearing.
There are things never to do,
neither by day nor by night,
neither by sea nor by shore:
for example, WAR.”
Words simple enough for a child. Apparently too dangerous for a stage.
What kind of future are we celebrating?
The Olympic principles are excellence, respect, and friendship. They aim to unite people through sport, promoting peace, solidarity, and inclusion.
And yet, this is what Ghali later wrote on Instagram:
“Peace? Harmony? Humanity?
I did not feel any of this last night, but I felt it through your messages.
People are what truly matter, and in a time of so much hatred, please do not play their game. Respond as we would want the world to be.
‘There are things that must never be done.’”
Ghali
Beyond the beautiful façade
We can celebrate Italianness at Milano Cortina Olympics. We can take pride in the landscape, culture, fashion, food, and athletes and everything else. But this could also be an opportunity to rethink how major events relate to territory, climate, and responsibility.
Instead, it risks becoming another case study in how sustainability is used as a decorative word—applied after the damage is done. A study in beautiful façades.
Snow is not a metaphor.
Ice is not a logo.
The climate crisis cannot be sponsored away.
And humanity does not come in Series A and Series B.
If they sold you the Winter Olympics as ethical and sustainable, this is greenwashing.
Milano Cortina Olympics: snow needs cold, not crude Read More »
