Is Gen Z’s hunt for the perfect knock-off a form of smart consumerism or a creative dead end?
The word dupe is everywhere—Gen Z seems to love it. Short for duplicate, it describes a copy, a replica, and, in essence, a fake. It implies a certain deception, a product that masquerades as the real thing. Yet, there is a crucial nuance: these are often “inspired” copies at a much lower price point.
Among younger generations, this has evolved into a full-blown “culture of the dupe”. The hunt for the super fake is also a form of resistance. Generation Z is clearly reacting against the social exclusion that luxury has long represented. They want to adopt the codes of high fashion without paying its symbolic price.
The spectrum of imitation
This trend exists on a spectrum. On one end, there is outright counterfeit—fake handbags, shirts, smartphones, and perfumes that violate trade rules and copyrights. This is a vast, illicit market that continues to thrive; in 2024 alone, EU authorities seized over 112 million counterfeit items, with an estimated retail value of €3.8 billion.
On the other end, however, are the perfectly legal ‘dupes’. These are low-cost versions of iconic products that promise similar effects without breaking the law. They are not brazen copies but inspirations, marketed as democratic shortcuts to luxury.
The allure of the dupe: Rebellion and savviness
For Gen Z, heavily influenced by social media platforms like TikTok, where the hashtag #dupe has amassed over 6 billion views, this is more than just shopping. It is a social activity. Young consumers proudly showcase their low-cost alternatives to iconic products.
This phenomenon is supported by academic research into the paradoxical relationship between counterfeits and luxury goods. Studies, including work from MIT Sloan, have suggested that widespread imitation does not diminish luxury brands but can, in fact, make them more desirable by serving as a form of free, ubiquitous advertising that reinforces their aspirational status. The dupe acts as a form of unofficial advertising, a common language that everyone learns to speak. Furthermore, buying a dupe carries another powerful appeal: it makes one feel clever. It is a shortcut that allows one to display a certain affiliation without paying the full price—a subtle deception that hints at belonging to a world that remains, in reality, financially out of reach.
This sentiment is captured by many in Gen Z, like Louana, a 24-year-old Parisian student (via Luxury Tribune). She explains that for her generation, dupes are a normalised response to a combination of factors: a perpetual hunt for a good deal, a perception of declining quality from established brands, and concerns over unethical production practices. For her, vintage is a first choice, but a good-quality, fairly-priced dupe is a completely satisfactory alternative.
The educational gap and the way forward
Louana’s perspective points to a deeper issue: a breakdown in trust and education. When luxury brands are perceived to sell poor quality at ridiculous markups or engage in questionable production methods, they fuel the justification for the dupe market. This dynamic has left a vacuum. Young generations see luxury as an aspiration but often lack the foundational knowledge to discern intrinsic quality—the ability to distinguish superior wool from polyester, or to identify craftsmanship made to last.
This leads to a profound question: is the hunt for a dupe the only form of resistance?
Final thoughts: A resistance that raises questions
In conclusion, it is true that for young people, the dupe can represent a form of resistance, a way to react against the social exclusion perpetuated by luxury. It is a symptom of economic pragmatism and a rejection of elitism. And, above all, the refusal to be tricked by luxury brands.
However, this leads to a more profound question: why are young people not educating themselves towards something better? Rather than choosing between an unaffordable original or a dubious copy, why not champion brands that offer quality and good design, made to last, at more reasonable prices? These may not be as cheap as a dupe, but they represent a more sustainable and ethically conscious middle ground.
The culture of the dupe is a complex rebellion, but the ultimate act of resistance would be to educate one’s taste towards genuine value—investing in quality and enduring design over the fleeting thrill of a clever imitation.