London fashion week

SS26 London Fashion Week: The high-low fashion line collapses

/ Leave a Comment
Reading Time: 4 minutes

Is London still a bastion of creative rebellion, or a stage for fast fashion exploitation?


The SS26 London Fashion Week has concluded, with its expanded schedule seeking a renaissance yet exposing a contradiction within the industry. While houses such as Burberry, Simone Rocha, and Erdem reaffirmed their creative authority, the prominent platform given to H&M raised a pressing question: how does this align with London’s professed commitment to sustainability? The line between luxury and fast fashion has not just blurred—it has collapsed.

SS26 London Fashion Week: Creative highlights


At Burberry, Daniel Lee recomposed British heritage with a rockstar edge. The collection was a tribute to swinging London—Mod-inspired short hemlines, slim suits, and leather boots, all set to a Black Sabbath soundtrack. A tribute to Ozzy Osbourne that delighted us fans. (Watch the show here).
Lee commented, “Musicians have always had incredible style, and together with fashion they form a really strong culture.” That was certainly true in the past. Today, rock stars don’t have personal style but stylists. And they’re paid to wear branded clothes—but that’s a topic for another post.

Simone Rocha offered a breath of fresh air with a feminine, childlike, and whimsical collection where lightness and an ethereal mood prevailed. Her designs reminded us why London has long been a laboratory for creative experimentation. (See the looks here).
Meanwhile, Erdem explored “overlapping identities,” blurring the lines between history and imagination in a masterful display of narrative craftsmanship. (Watch the show here).

Yet, this creative reaffirmation was juxtaposed with the event’s strategic inclusion of H&M. The Swedish fast-fashion giant hosted an immersive showcase, leveraging the city’s youthful energy. Its presence was no anomaly but a calculated move that speaks volumes about the event’s current priorities.

The logic behind H&M’s platform


Laura Weir, the new CEO of the British Fashion Council and a former Vogue fashion editor, has described the task of restoring London’s fashion status as “herculean.” After Brexit, Covid, economic instability, and wars, her effort is understandable. But if the goal is to strengthen London’s global standing, is giving H&M such a prominent role really a meaningful long-term choice?

For H&M, a place on the LFW schedule is the ultimate PR coup. It borrows prestige and “cool factor” to reposition itself from a seller of cheap basics to a legitimate trend-maker, helping to justify its premium collaborations and designer partnerships.

From the organisers’ perspective, the logic is equally clear: LFW is, after all, a business. Burberry generates press, but the British Fashion Council needs revenue. H&M’s substantial investment helps subsidise smaller, emerging designers—the lifeblood of London’s reputation for innovation. Furthermore, an H&M presentation can attract celebrities and mega-influencers who might not attend a smaller, avant-garde show. (Sadness of contemporary fashion, as it sounds.) This generates massive social media buzz and media coverage that amplify the event’s visibility.

When blurring lines becomes a blurred vision


The lines between luxury fashion and fast fashion are no longer merely blurred—they are actively erasing each other.

Luxury has adopted the pace of fast fashion: pre-collections, cruise collections, and countless “drops.” They need to constantly feed the content and sales machine. They also court influencers and celebrities in a way that mirrors mass-market marketing.

Fast fashion seeks the cultural capital of luxury: H&M hires former luxury designers, produces “premium” lines, and runs high-production-value campaigns to emulate a luxury feel.

London Fashion Week has always celebrated eclecticism and experimentation. London has historically been the birthplace of street style co-opted by high fashion (punk, mod, etc.). It’s where Vivienne Westwood sold clothes in a shop called SEX. But there is a world of difference between elevating grassroots rebellion and platforming a corporate fast fashion giant. 

The critical question is: what is the cost of this “inclusive” curation? By including H&M, is LFW nurturing creativity or legitimising a business model built on overconsumption? This move directly challenges the halo of exclusivity and creativity—and most importantly, the ecological values London claims to champion. 

Final thoughts


The rock energy of Burberry and the H&M presentation are two sides of the same coin in today’s fashion industry. SS26 London Fashion Week is not merely observing the collapse of the high-low divide; it is actively curating and capitalising on it.

The danger is that the marketing power of fast-fashion players may drown out emerging voices, turning what should be a celebration of creativity into a marketing convention. True London “street” DNA is anti-establishment and authentic. Aligning with corporate fast fashion is the opposite—it’s the ultimate embrace of the establishment.

By giving H&M a platform, London Fashion Week may not just be selling tickets — it may be selling its soul.

SS26 London Fashion Week: The high-low fashion line collapses Read More »

British Fashion Council pivots: June LFW moves to Paris as brands seek global spotlight

/ Leave a Comment
Reading Time: 3 minutes

London steps back, Paris steps up: The BFC’s gamble to relocate brands reveals fashion’s widening power gap


The British Fashion Council (BFC) pivots: it will skip June’s London Fashion Week, opting instead to showcase menswear designers in Paris during the French capital’s event. The move, framed as a ‘strategic evolution,’ underscores the growing pressure on cities beyond Paris to justify standalone runways in an era of instability, where buyers and media increasingly prioritize fewer, high-impact events.

While the BFC emphasizes the benefits—including a dedicated London Show Rooms (LSR) space in Paris for emerging designers—critics warn that ceding the June calendar risks eroding London’s reputation as a cradle of innovation. The decision reflects broader shifts: the rise of co-ed collections, budget pressures, and the gravitational pull of Paris, where even British talent now flocks for visibility.

The Paris effect


“Brexit stole the show from London Fashion Week—and gifted it to Paris,” titled Politico recently. The prophecy now rings louder. Paris Fashion Week, already a magnet for global designers, offers what London struggles to guarantee: buyer density, prestige, and a direct path to commercial success.

In fact, there has always been a creative dialogue between Paris and London. But after Covid and Brexit, keeping this dialogue alive became more challenging, said Serge Carreira from the Fédération de la Haute Couture et de la Mode. “London is a scene of revelations, where one puts down creative roots, whereas Paris is a destination once the brand is established, to reach a more global audience,” declared Carreira to CNN. “This dynamic isn’t new but Paris as a next step in a British designer’s career might feel like a more amplified move.” 

The emerging designer trade-off


The BFC’s LSR initiative in Paris grants emerging designers valuable buyer access—but at what cost? London’s identity as a cradle of avant-garde experimentation is increasingly sidelined. With PFW boasting over 100 shows across nine days, and London’s calendar shrinking, the capital risks becoming a feeder system rather than a rival.

Yet signs of rebellion stir. Off-calendar British brands like Corteiz may point to a new generation that rejects the spectacle of traditional runway shows. Instead, they favour creative drops, limited-run capsules, and collaborations—questioning the fashion system itself.

This hints at an alternative future: another avant-garde is emerging, one that rejects the old system entirely.

Alternative futures


Some of the most compelling moments during London Fashion Week came not from the main stage, but from smaller, off-schedule presentations. These intimate settings—less about commercial splash, more about authentic expression—felt both innovative and grounded.

Perhaps that’s the real shift worth watching. In an age of climate anxiety and economic instability, the next generation of designers may no longer aspire to put on hyper-expensive shows filled with endless outfits. Instead, they might choose meaningful connections, slower processes, and sustainability-first design.

British Fashion Council pivots: A warning for New York?


London’s struggle mirrors NYC’s: both risk becoming satellites to Paris and Milan. If even British talent—nurtured by institutions like Central Saint Martins—flees homegrown runways, what hope remains for cities without that legacy?

Final thoughts: Business over romance


The British Fashion Council pivots. The decision to relocate June’s LFW to Paris is a business-first gamble, a bet on survival prioritising global reach over tradition. Therefore, an attempt to stay relevant in a market that increasingly rewards consolidation. The shift highlights fashion’s uneven power balance, with Paris solidifying its dominance. 

But as Paris tightens its grip, London faces an existential question: Can it remain a creative capital in a system that increasingly prioritises commerce over risk-taking?

It’s a surrender to Paris’ dominance, yes, but also a referendum on whether creativity alone can sustain a fashion capital today.

The answer may lie off-calendar—in intimate presentations, climate-conscious design, and disruptors—brands unafraid to break the mould. 

Ultimately, fashion’s future cannot be just more Paris. Fashion’s future belongs to those brave enough to imagine something else entirely.

British Fashion Council pivots: June LFW moves to Paris as brands seek global spotlight Read More »

A leaner schedule at London Fashion Week

/ Leave a Comment
Reading Time: 3 minutes

Why smaller brands are leading the change


The luxury slowdown has led to a leaner schedule for the FW25/26 London Fashion Week, which ran from Thursday 20th to Monday 24th February. This year, numerous brands opted to drop out or reimagine their presentations entirely.

For decades, the traditional fashion calendar—anchored by the biannual September and March runway shows—has dictated the industry’s rhythm. But times are changing. While luxury giants cling to their established schedules, buoyed by corporate budgets, smaller brands are quietly rewriting the rules.

FW25/26 London Fashion Week: A leaner schedule


“Some designers are cutting costs by choosing to sit out alternate fashion weeks, showing just once a year. The fashion system of having a new look each September and March, which once tied the industry to biannual shows, has fallen away in favour of a more fluid era of vibes and microtrends.”  Jess Cartner-Morley on The Guardian

As The Guardian reports, independent designers are increasingly opting for a single annual show, prioritising creativity over relentless production. Yet, this shift isn’t merely a response to financial pressures. It’s a deliberate recalibration. A growing number of brands recognise that the ceaseless demand for newness, once the lifeblood of fashion, now feels out of step with the times. Instead, they are embracing a more considered, sustainable approach—one that champions craftsmanship, longevity, and deeper connections with their audience.

“We wanted to step back from the traditional format and create a space for meaningful conversations and shared experiences,” says Patrick McDowell, a London-based independent sustainable luxury fashion brand, who hosted a dinner at Aqua Nueva’s rooftop. “Fashion is as much about the people who wear it as it is about the garments themselves, and we’re excited to celebrate this moment with our extended family of collaborators, supporters, and friends.”

This move is a direct response to an industry that has, for years, been driven by breakneck speed. The rise of endless trends, turbocharged by social media, has blurred the lines between seasonal collections. Coupled with economic instability and the luxury slowdown, the fashion industry finds itself at a crossroads.

Redefining the fashion industry through a cultural shift


In this new landscape, where trends come and go at lightning speed and budgets are tighter than ever, smaller brands are finding strength in resisting the pressure to produce twice a year. By presenting just once, they offer something more meaningful—designs that transcend fleeting trends and aspire to timelessness.

In contrast, luxury conglomerates remain tethered to their established schedules. Their dominance thrives on spectacle and overproduction, elements deeply ingrained in the biannual format. Yet, the quiet revolution led by independent labels signals a broader cultural shift. The future of fashion isn’t about adhering to old patterns—it’s about redefining them.

Final thoughts: towards a new rhythm for fashion


In conclsuion, a leaner schedule at London Fashion Week may stem from financial constraints, but it has also sparked a surge of creativity. Far from being a sign of weakness, this shift represents a more meaningful way to connect. It’s not just about the runway itself, but about how the conversation can evolve, what it has the power to inspire, and what ideas it propels forward.

As the industry stands at this crossroads, it’s worth asking: Will the future of fashion prioritise longevity over excess? If smaller brands are any indication, the answer is already taking shape—through deliberate creativity, intentional design, and a commitment to redefining what fashion can be. Less, but better.

A leaner schedule at London Fashion Week Read More »