climate change

Is It Time to Give Up On The COPs?

COP29 in Azerbaijan: Oil and Corruption for Climate Change


Is it time to give up on the COPs? Perhaps we need to question the relevance of these events altogether. This year, COP29 is being held in Azerbaijan – a petro-state notorious for corruption, where its CEO was secretly filmed while making gas and oil deals. 

But is this the climate action platform the world needs? Or is it a glaring sign of systemic failure?

“It’s unacceptable that a country that depends upon oil and doesn’t respect human rights is hosting COP29” – declared Greta Thunberg, who boycotted the event.

COP29 – Azerbaijan

The annual climate conference has sparked fierce criticism. In a divisive address, Azerbaijan’s president declared oil to be a “gift of God.” Meanwhile, with Trump’s recent election victory, there is growing concern that the climate emergency could vanish from the global agenda entirely.

Rupert Read, leader of The Climate Majority Project, reflected on the unfolding debacle: “The news that the head of COP was using COP to make gas deals is hardly even a surprise.”

This revelation underscores the troubling state of an institution increasingly out of step with its mission. However, Read sees a potential upside: growing scepticism around COP could catalyze the creation of meaningful alternatives. “What we need are coalitions of the willing – countries genuinely committed to action. COP was designed to fail.”

With the 1.5°C target now out of reach, the narrative must shift. Pretending that decarbonization alone will suffice is no longer viable. Instead, the focus must pivot to transformative and strategic adaptation. “In this context, adaptation, preparedness, and resilience-building aren’t optional – they are pivotal. These measures will determine whether humanity survives, let alone flourishes,” says Read.

Is it time to give up?

The future of the climate movement won’t hinge on a singular solution but rather a multiplicity of efforts. “The next big thing will be lots of things” – Read explains on his website. “It will emerge from millions of people with diverse backgrounds, talents, and needs, each finding their own part to play in something much, much larger. We could never actually construct such a movement. We can only do everything we can to make sure it happens.”

In conclusion, can these events still become platforms for real change, or is it time to move beyond? Is it time to give up on the COPs entirely?

Yes… it may sound rhetorical.


🖤 Dive into our latest post, and don’t hesitate to reach out. You can comment here below (just register first), or drop us an email or WhatsApp. We’d love to hear from you! Whether you have questions, feedback, or just want to say hello, we’re all ears. 

Let’s start a conversation!  

#formodernhumans

Is It Time to Give Up On The COPs? Read More »

Valencia’s Nightmare: Catastrophic Flooding & Human Inaction

Climate Change: What do we do with the information?


Valencia’s nightmare of catastrophic flooding wreaking havoc underscores a grim truth about climate change. Despite mounting evidence, human inaction remains the norm. 

So, “what do we do with the information?”
Rupert Read, author and professor of philosophy, poses this question as he reflects on this tragedy.

Valencia’s nightmare: flooding wreak havoc

In the span of just eight hours, Valencia was hit with a year’s worth of rain, resulting in more than 200 deaths. But this brutal event isn’t an isolated incident. Indeed, it mirrors extreme weather patterns seen in Italy and across the globe. And yet, our response remains inadequate in the face of such overwhelming evidence. There is a disturbing trend of growing numbness. A tendency to witness these catastrophes from a distance, accepting them as a new normal.

Climate emergency & humans inaction

Rupert Read’s poignant words, shared in a recent video, go straight to the heart of the issue:

“How do we handle the fact that people are suffering immensely because of the climate crisis and the response to that suffering doesn’t seem to be adequate? This is a very important dimension of the crisis that I don’t think has been fully understood yet. There is a gap between the amount of response, the amount in this case of, say, sadness we are feeling on the one hand, and the appropriate amount, on the other hand, of us collectively as a society, as a civilization. There isn’t nearly enough in the mass media about the immense suffering that the Spanish people are going through right now. And, about what it should mean to us.

Consider the idea of us being in a climate and ecological emergency, as a good reason for saying that we are, we are not treating collectively as an emergency. There is a gap between the actual emergency and the extent to which it’s being treated as an emergency.”


Read calls this crisis a “meta-emergency,” where our inability to treat the situation with the urgency it deserves amplifies the problem itself. He notes, “The meta-emergency is that we are not treating the emergency as an emergency. And that makes it so much worse. If we were responding adequately, we would be in a much better position than the one we find ourselves in today.”

In Read’s view, our collective failure to grasp the full scope of our environmental crisis is staggering. And this lack of recognition is a critical part of the problem. “This is the most troubling aspect of our failure,” he argues, “that it hasn’t even been fully recognized as a failure.” He advocates for a sweeping public inquiry on a global scale – a massive truth and reconciliation commission for climate, to understand how we’ve allowed things to go so terribly wrong for so long.

The emotional toll of these events also warrants attention. Read observes that our sadness, worry, and anger for the Spanish people don’t suffice. Instead, he identifies a secondary layer of sadness – “meta-sadness” – which arises from the inadequacy of our emotional response to these events.

What Solution Does Rupert Read Offer?

So, Valencia’s nightmare of catastrophic flooding make us sad or angry but that is not enough. Read suggests that by recognizing our “meta-sadness” – our grief over our collective emotional inadequacy – we put ourselves in a better position to act. By acknowledging our insufficient responses, we open the door to more meaningful action. It’s a call to move beyond passive observation. And to challenge the systems that perpetuate this cycle of apathy and inaction.

This awareness could be the first step toward bridging the gap between understanding the problem and taking the decisive action required to address it.

Ultimately, only a true, intense, and profound awareness can wake us from this torpor, and push us toward collective action.


🖤 Dive into our latest post, and don’t hesitate to reach out. You can comment here below (just register first), or drop us an email or WhatsApp. We’d love to hear from you! Whether you have questions, feedback, or just want to say hello, we’re all ears. 

Let’s start a conversation!  

#formodernhumans

Valencia’s Nightmare: Catastrophic Flooding & Human Inaction Read More »